On the other hand, the Sennheiser RS 175 headphones are better for those who prefer a more balanced sound signature and want a slightly bass-heavy response. The RS 175 headphones provide tight and not overpowering bass that does not drown out the vocals. They are suitable for genres where a balanced sound is desired, such as classical and jazz music. Additionally, the RS 195 headphones have selectable hearing boost presets, which can improve certain frequencies, making them ideal for individuals with specific hearing needs. Our Wireless Headphone Systems can be connected into virtually any audio device and it is just a matter of identifying the appropriate audio output port and then having the appropriate connecting plug or component. A solution to avoid having to unplug from one component and plug into the other component all the time you could use an AV switching box to create a hub where all the external components can be connected into one place. The hub will then provide outputs to run audio to the TV and audio to the headphones as well. Obstacles are one of the main factors that can effect the transmission range of the wireless signal. While the wireless signal (with the exception of infrared signals) can pass through obstacles (like walls) ultimately range will be affected (likely reduced) by passing through these obstacles and the more dense the obstacle the greater the effect will be on the signal. For example a signal passing through a glass window won't be affected very much whereas a signal passing through a concrete wall will be effected much more greatly. Having a clear line of sight does provide the best transmission range.

The Sennheiser RS 195 headphones use a 2.4 GHz RF signal for wireless audio transmission. They have a transmission range of up to 330 feet (100 meters) in line of sight, according to a product review on liquidaudio.com. This means that you can enjoy your music without worrying about tangled cords and move around the room freely without the sound cutting out. However, the plastic used for the ear cups of the RS 175 feels low grade and cheap, according to the same review. Without specific weight measurements or comparisons, it is challenging to make a definitive statement about the weight of these headphones. The available information does not provide any details regarding the weight of either model. Therefore, it is not possible to determine which headphones are lighter based solely on the information provided.In situations where the WiFi router cannot be changed manually the simple solution is to turn off the headphones and the WiFi router. Start the headphones and let them run for 15 minutes to establish their signal and then turn on the WiFi router. The WiFi router will "see" the signal of the headphones and establish it's own signal in a different part of the bandwidth and the two devices will work without interfering with each other. NOTE: Once this process has been done the signals are established and will remain established even with a device is turned off. However, it can be inferred that the RS 195 headphones are heavier than the RS 175 headphones. This inference is based on the assumption that newer models tend to have additional features and improvements, which can often result in increased weight. Since the RS 195 is a more recent model compared to the RS 175, it is reasonable to assume that it may be heavier due to potential advancements in technology and added functionalities. In terms of treble frequencies, the RS 195 headphones offer a warm and organic treble that is clear and detailed without being harsh or overly bright. This makes them suitable for genres that require smooth and pleasant treble, such as acoustic and vocal-focused music. The audio signal itself is corrupted and the hiss is actually part of the audio signal. This typically occurs when a cable signal is involved. The resolution is to call the cable company and request that the audio signal is reset.

Latency occurs in all wireless headphones however the technology being used to create the wireless signal does affect how much latency is caused. For example a Radio Frequency (RF) model (like the Set 840) has a latency of approximately 3 m/s whereas a KLEER digital model (like the RS 160/RS 170/RS 180) has a latency of approximately 45 m/s. Usually the delay (even at the 45 m/s level) is not discernible and hence goes unnoticed. All of the external audio components are connected directly into a device (TV, Receiver, etc) however the devices are utilizing different types of audio signal (analog, digital, HDMI, etc) and the device that the headphones are connected to can only output some of these signals in a format that the headphones can utilize. The headphones are designed to use an analog signal so this is the type of signal that the device needs to output for the headphones to use.Being given the option of a digital connection means that you don’t need to use your amplifier and can take a feed directly out of your source, such as the Audiolab 6000CDT CD Transport we used. The pure signal means that you’re less likely to experience audio dropout when you move away from the transmitter and you get a cleaner sound too. No list of headphones is going to meet the needs of everyone, so we’ve taken the time to research these additional models for your consideration. Anything listed here will work well with a TV set, provided it supports Bluetooth, and the correct codecs. To take out the doubt, though, we always recommend a good transmitter to remove all doubt.