Berthon, Pierre R.; Fedorenko, Ivan; Pitt, Leyland F.; Ferguson, Sarah Lord (2019). "Can Brand Custodians Cope with Fake News? Marketing Assets in the Age of Truthiness and Post-fact". In Parvatiyar, Atul; Sisodia, Rajendra (eds.). Handbook of Advances in Marketing in an Era of Disruptions: Essays in Honour of Jagdish N. Sheth. SAGE Publications India. ISBN 9789352808182.

Shieber, Stuart M. (May–June 2015). "Is This Article Consistent with Hinchliffe's Rule?" (PDF). Annals of Improbable Research. 21 (3) . Retrieved 12 May 2019. Probably not. Especially if whatever it is, is a one-off occurrence or relates to one individual. Most of the time, a conversation will be just fine. Resist the urge to turn everything into a document. Schwab, Victor O. (September 1939). "An Advertisement That Is Never Changed". Printers' Ink Monthly: 10–11, 64–65. If the headline asks a question, try answering 'no'. Is This the True Face of Britain's Young? (Sensible reader: No.) Have We Found the Cure for AIDS? (No; or you wouldn't have put the question mark in.) Does This Map Provide the Key for Peace? (Probably not.) A headline with a question mark at the end means, in the vast majority of cases, that the story is tendentious or over-sold. It is often a scare story, or an attempt to elevate some run-of-the-mill piece of reporting into a national controversy and, preferably, a national panic. To a busy journalist hunting for real information a question mark means 'don't bother reading this bit'. [11] Studies [ edit ] Bear in mind that, by design, the areas where the Mietpreisbremse applies are areas where demand exceeds supply. There will be more than one applicant per flat, and if you are one of them, you will want to impress your potential future landlord. Emphasising what a tidy, reliable and responsible person you are might be a good idea. Asking inquisitive questions about how the rent had been worked out, and whether it is definitely Mietpreisbremse-compliant, not so much.It is worth reading up on the Swedish system. Their rent control system does not cap rents or freeze them but controls them by controlling the increases in rents through collective bargaining between landlords and tenants unions. Rises are almost always above CPI/Inflation. The resulting increase is then ‘distributed’ across the different properties according to the ‘use value’ system. So were all those warnings about the devastating effects of rent controls just neoliberal propaganda? Have we finally found out how to make rent controls works?

Big Data will likely continue to help firms improve consumer satisfaction, but these improvements in marketing and supply-chain management are inherently predicated on free markets. Grandiose predictions of a new scientific revolution to replace markets with socialism amount to updated Lysenkoist rhetoric. Governments who use Big Data to control their economies will face predictable consequences. Not unless you have already explored every possible way of resolving the situation; grievances polarise people and are rarely constructive experiences. Firstly, people working from home are not commuting so are therefore saving money. Consequently they don’t need as much salary. No. If a candidate was good enough that you wanted to offer them a job, then offer them everything. What message do you think it sends if you make them prove that your hiring decision was right before you offer them what everyone else gets? Gooden, Philip (2015). "Arts". Skyscrapers, Hemlines and the Eddie Murphy Rule (1sted.). Bloomsbury Information. ISBN 9781472915023.So I got to thinking. What are the HR versions of QTWTAIN? Here are mine…… but I’d love to hear yours too. Not quite. The reason why the Mietpreisbremse has not had any discernible negative effects is simply that it has not had any discernible effects at all. Rents in controlled areas have shown the same trend as rents in otherwise similar, but uncontrolled areas, so it has not been much of a Bremse (=brake) at all. Why not? Locricchio v. Evening News Association, 438Mich.84(1991-08-26)("Nor is it determinative here that the sting of the headline concludes with a question mark — 'Is it Mafia?'"). Juergens, George (2015). "Sensationalism". Joseph Pulitzer and the New York World. Princeton University Press. ISBN 9781400877959. A 2018 study of 2,585 articles in four academic journals in the field of ecology similarly found that very few titles were posed as questions at all, with 1.82 percent being wh-questions and 2.15 percent being yes/no questions. Of the yes/no questions, 44 percent were answered "yes", 34 percent "maybe", and only 22 percent were answered "no". [13]

Betteridge's name became associated with the concept after he discussed it in a February 2009 article, which examined a previous TechCrunch article that carried the headline "Did Last.fm Just Hand Over User Listening Data to the RIAA?" ( Schonfeld 2009): So here’s the crux: if you want to make rent controls more fine-grained and flexible, you inevitably increase their complexity, and create uncertainty. Under those conditions, rent controls cannot be automatically enforced: you need proactive tenants, who insist on their enforcement. In areas where demand exceeds supply, tenants are not in a position to behave in that way. They might, in markets which are more skewed in the tenant’s favour, but of course, in such markets, you don’t need rent controls in the first place. Not unless it is a gross misconduct offence, or as above, you have explored other ways of dealing with the situation. Discipline should be the last resort, not the first step.No. Never. I can think of few more crappy things to do to your people. If someone is doing a job well, then they shouldn’t need to apply for it. If they are not then they need that a whole different type of conversation. More and more, firms use algorithms to spot market trends and predict consumer behaviour. 21st-century consumers constantly interact with such algorithms. It's an old truism among journalists..." ". MeatRobot.org.uk. 4 December 2007 . Retrieved 12 May 2019. You may have come across the concept of Questions To Which The Answer Is No. It comes from Betteridge’s law of headlines that states: ‘any headline that ends in a question mark, can be answered by the word no‘. There is even an annual award ceremony for the best examples of the tradition. In the field of particle physics, the concept is known as Hinchliffe's rule, after physicist Ian Hinchliffe, who stated that if a research paper's title is in the form of a yes–no question, the answer to that question will be "no". [37] [38] The adage led into a humorous attempt at a liar paradox by a 1988 paper, written by physicist Boris Kayser under the pseudonym "Boris Peon", which bore the title: "Is Hinchliffe's Rule True?" ( Peon 1988). [39] [38] See also [ edit ]