Having known a family friend who suffered from early onset dementia, I was completely empathetic to Dave/Luke and his heartbreaking situation. When a local girl is murdered under similar circumstances as the unsolved murder of Margot’s childhood best friend, Margot goes on a mission to try and prove they’re connected and solve them both. Very disappointing actions by one of the biggest true crime podcasts, not to mention the complete lack of personal ethics and morals.

And my favorite… a character kidnapped after standing outside at night and turning her back on an approaching vehicle, whose driver pulls to a stop, the driver exits and an older woman kidnapper grabs the character from behind and drags her back to her vehicle where she forces her inside and drives away. Like I said before, there really aren't any surprises, and if there are, there's not enough suspenseful tension built up to make the reader care about the identity of the villain(s).

Margo is a crime reporter who failed at her job recently because she was grieving for the loss of her aunt and worrying for her uncle who's experiencing early signs of dementia. She’s a journalist and takes an interest in a child abduction that looks similar to an unsolved murder of her best friend January when she was just 6 years old. In 2009, after Krissy confided in Jodie that she had been the one to stage January’s death as a murder, Krissy says she’s going to tell Dave the truth. Margot Davies was January’s best friend and 6 at the time of her BFFs disappearance and it shook her to her core.

Long story short, Casey’s lawyer’s explanation for Caylee’s death was that it was an accidental drowning that had been staged as a kidnapping/murder so Casey wouldn’t be blamed. All Good People Here has plot elements similar to a completely spectulative and unproven theory about the JBR case, that one or both of JBR’s parents staged the scene to cover up the fact that someone in the family was involved in what happened to JonBenét. I couldn’t agree with you more, I was counting on Jodi or Luke in a moment of lucidity to come in and save Margot. You also get alternating chapters told from the POV of January’s mom, Kristy, from 1994 when the murder occurred. And back in 1994, on the night of January’s murder, I told Billy that I was the twins’ father and he was MAD.I don’t mind an ending that leaves a bit to the imagination or one that is slightly ambiguous, but this just ends at a pivotal moment. As CCO, she works with her team to create an overarching content strategy and vision for the network of shows and company growth. Seriously for starters just say he has dementia or early onset dementia stop referring to it as his condition.

Natalie Clark may have been the catalyst for Margot’s investigation but HER story is never explored, making this a journalist’s quest to solve a COLD CASE. Thank you to the author, the publisher, and NetGalley for a copy of this story publishing in November. As Margot, an investigative reporter and best former friend of the young murdered victim, looks back twenty odd years ago, she senses there is a story there plus an undiscovered murderer.January’s cold case has always haunted her and now in a neighbouring town another little girl goes missing under suspiciously similar circumstances. Because we don’t compare the two cases, past and present throughout the narrative, I didn’t feel any sense of TENSION, like I usually do with CRIME FICTION. As for the Natalie Clark case, it was clever of the book to suggest that the killer could be the same person, though I wondered why there would have been a twenty-year gaps in the killer’s crimes (this was explained in the book).