When I use a word,’ Humpty Dumpty said in rather a scornful tone, ‘it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.’ ’The question is,’ said Alice, ‘whether you can make words mean so many different things.’ ’The question is,’ said Humpty Dumpty, ‘which is to be master — that’s all ». Durkheim É., 1914, « Le dualisme de la nature humaine et ses conditions sociales », Scientia, XV, pp. 206-221. Sennett R., 2013, Together. The Rituals, Pleasures and Politics of Cooperation , Yale, Yale University Press. However, Sennett also points out deeper problems implicit in this way of thinking. In particular, he describes how the intimate society tends towards de-politicization- if 'impersonal forces' are not emotionally gratifying, then they are not considered important in the way personal things are. A person may not wish to conceive of the position they occupy in a social class hierarchy because that would undermine their 'personality'. This prevents them from acting in concert with others to improve their conditions. Glendinning tells a story about the couple staying at a mutual friend's country house. The host told her that after everyone had gone to bed, peals of laughter were heard coming from their bedroom. Glendinning thinks that "for a couple who are apart an awful lot of the time, it works very well when they are together". Sennett, who has no children of his own, is by all accounts a devoted stepfather to Saskia's only son, Hilary, 25, a sculptor in New York.

Darnton R., 1984, Le Grand Massacre des chats. Attitudes et croyances dans l’ancienne France, trad. de l’anglais (États-Unis) par M.-A. Revellat, Paris, R. Laffont, 1985.Elias N., 1939, La Civilisation des mœurs, trad. de l’allemand par P. Kamnitzer, Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1973.

At the same time he describes his students here, "as the best I've ever had". Sennett claims he has written enough. He would like to end his days as he began them, as a professional performer or possibly running a music festival, maybe somewhere like the Wigmore Hall in London. When he has finished the current book on socialism, "I have probably only one book left in me. I would like to do something on the sociology of performing." In the course of this investigation, Sennett covers a lot of ground. He discusses street life in the 18th and 19th century, the evolution of audience behaviour in the theatre, fashion developments, the rise of the department store, Lamartine's oratory skills and Zola's intervention during the Dreyfus affair - to name just a few of a topics dealt with in the course of this book. Mauss M., 1925, Essai sur le don. Forme et raison de l’échange dans les sociétés archaïques, Paris, Presses universitaires de France, 2007.Sennett takes a skeptical view of our tendency to judge by apparent personality and intention, above or even in place of acts on record. He notes the dangers of this view: a crippling personal (and societal) incidence of narcissism and susceptibility to charlatans and charismatic exploiters to name a few. Carroll L., 1871, Alice. De l’autre côté du miroir, trad. de l’anglais par E. Riot, Paris, Librio, 2017. The obsession with persons at the expense of more impersonal social relations is like a filter which discolors our rational understanding of society; it obscures the continuing importance of class in advanced industrial society; *it leads us to believe community is an act of mutual self-disclosure and to undervalue the community relations of strangers, particularly those which occur in cities.* PDF / EPUB File Name: The_Fall_of_Public_Man_40th_Anniversary_E_-_Richard_Sennett.pdf, The_Fall_of_Public_Man_40th_Anniversary_E_-_Richard_Sennett.epub

Allard-Huver F., 2017, « Fake news », in : Publictionnaire encyclopédique et critique des publics. Accès : http://publictionnaire.huma-num.fr/notice/fake-news/. Consulté le 22/11/2019. If the way in which Sennett gathers material to chronicle this “fall” is careless, the causes he provides for the downhill journey are flim-flam. There are three: industrial capitalism (or the capitalist system), secularism (or secularity), and a mysterious third force that Sennett never defines but calls “a strength which became a weakness. . . .” Of secularism the less said the better, for the definition Sennett provides is worthy of a Woody Allen: “‘The reason things are as they are in the world, reasons which will cease to matter in themselves, once we are dead.’ (See Chapter 1.)” But in any case Sennett’s major reason for the collapse of Public Man is clearly industrial capitalism. A monster of Miltonic dimensions—the sire of Mystification, Privatization, and Commodity Fetishism—capitalism is also endowed with Orwellian powers, for it “controls not only the ideas of those who are its defenders, but shapes the imagination of those who are in revolt against its evils.” Sennett insists that this creature’s ravages know no boundaries, but if such is the case, why is there no mention of Japan, a capitalist country that appears to have maintained its Public Manners? We are also offered nothing on how Public Man has fared in non-capitalist countries.

Retailers:

A provocative book ... Sennett brings us to an undeniably recognizable place, the contemporary urban scene'

I had never heard of Richard Sennett until a read an article about the evolving role that clothing has played in the 20th century and how that is a reflection upon how people see themselves in relation to society—“The Fall of Public Man” was referenced in the article in connection to one of the more interesting points. As with so many books, I placed a library hold on the title and just kind of forgot about it… I’m not acting. This is who I am » cité dans le Whashington Post , 27/01/2016. Accès : https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/national/2016/01/27/deciders-trump/?utm_term=.9b3473f93873. Pour une analyse de la figure prétendument authentique de D. Trump comme processus de « dé-figuration politique », voir L. Kaufmann (2019). Peters J. D., 2006, « Media as Conversation, Conversation as Media? », pp. 115-126, in: Curran J., Morley D., eds, Media & Cultural Theory, Londres, Routledge. Plusieurs comptes rendus notent avec ironie que les réflexions de R. Sennett reflètent son propre m (...)Castel R., 2010, « Individu par excès, individu par défaut », pp. 293-305, in : Le Bart C., Corcuff P., Singly F. de, dirs, L’Individu aujourd’hui : Débats sociologiques et contrepoints philosophiques, Rennes, Presses universitaires de Rennes. Accès : https://doi.org/10.4000/books.pur.13657 . Horton R., Wohl R., 1956, « Mass Communication and Parasocial Interaction. Observation on Intimacy at a Distance », Psychiatry. Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 19, pp. 215-229.
Kaufmann L., 2013, « Les médiations de l’expérience. Retour sur l’œuvre de Dorothy Smith », EspacesTemps.net. Accès : https://www.espacestemps.net/articles/les-mediations-de-lexperience/. Book Genre: Anthropology, Culture, ers, History, Nonfiction, Philosophy, Politics, Psychology, rs, Social Science, Society, Sociology, Theory Arendt H., 1958, Condition de l’homme moderne, trad. de l’anglais (États-Unis) par G. Fradier, Paris, Calmann-Lévy, 1961.