Sad to see a wasted license, and sad to know that even if madden came out on switch it would be some nerfed garbage. With all that said though, Puyo Puyo Tetris 2 had very little in the way of new content (the visual style was also indistinguishable from the first game) and yet that received the same rating (8/10) as its predecessor. What gives? Why wasn't that bashed for being ridiculously derivative? Don't get me wrong, I'm one of the dummy-dumb-dumbs who bought the game, but I wouldn't exactly endorse it either, and if I were to cut the score down by virtue of its derivativeness, then Puyo Puyo Tetris 2 should also be given an abysmal score. Honestly, if EA put out a feature complete FIFA on Switch, I'd buy it over the PS4 version - portability would suit the way I play FIFA completely.

sixrings For many genres, 720p @ 30 FPS is perfectly acceptable and shouldn't offend anybody. There are some genres where 60 FPS is needed, and developers should do the best they can, but otherwise anything better than that should be treated as a bonus. I personally can't tell the difference, anyway.

FIFA 21 Guides

scully1888 This is likely because, with the PS/XB/PC versions of the game essentially 'one', EA can't justify reprogramming the legacy version of the game to feature those new elements you talk of.

sure is going fast, and now that it's May, it means E3 is just around the corner. The main all-digital event is scheduled to take place between 12th-15th of June, but not every publisher and developer is necessarily participating in the main show.And the thing is that they seem pretty similar. Even Rise has the map with the numbered areas like all the other handheld MHs (I don't know about World or Iceborne, I prefer to play on handhelds). And to your second point, thar same argument can be made re: Nintendo. You're getting the game on the box? They're not hiding the ball, why are you not okay with that? The frustrating thing is that it’s a Catch-22 situation. If questioned about this, EA would undoubtedly claim that nobody is playing the thing on Switch so there’s no point in putting extra resources into improving it. But the point is, nobody’s going to play something that’s clearly undercooked and frankly inferior to what’s being offered on other systems. We aren’t talking about the gameplay on the pitch: of course, the Switch is a less powerful system, so that’s understandable. But in terms of features, there’s no technical reason why Ultimate Team can’t have every option the other formats do. It is the worst experience from this series. I played FIFA 19, 20, and 21 and this game on Nintendo Switch is on free-falling !! Upon its reveal, critics and fans criticised FIFA 21 's box art, calling its composition incoherent and comparing it to the cover of EA Sports UFC 4, which received similar criticism. [44] "Content granting" controversy [ edit ]

When you are agreeing with Agramonte (a guy I ignore as he is insufferable) you have already lost the argument! Unless your only metric is fps / res, which to each their own but I'll state remains strange to me. PS3 originally. Also it runs in some capacity on mobile devices. Since Fifa is actually better on phones than it is on the Switch. I think the last FIFA games I played on a Nintendo console may have been 2008, 2010, 2012. Never have and probably never will buy a Switch release. Thanks for the bold and honest review. EA should know that there is no necessity to release a FIFA game for Switch.

Reviews

If people are dumb enough to keep buying it then there's no reason for them to stop I guess. They're getting a lot of free money for doing literally nothing. reason why i havent bought anything from greedy EA for a long time since mass effect 3 for wii u and need for speed most wanted thats it.