There he began a business career that made him a respectable, if not prosperous man. As the years went on, he trained his five sons in business and began to establish them in the cities that would house the five branches of the family bank: Frankfurt (Amschel), London (Nathan), Naples (Carl), Vienna (Solomon), and Paris (James).

This book has a lot of detail, which I enjoyed quite a bit. In addition to detail about the family it goes into depth about finance and economics, and the politics (and wars, etc.) going on in Europe during the first half of the 19th century, obviously as how they pertain to the Rothschild family. This is a sprawling, fascinating, deep and finally difficult work of history, one that offers an original glance at the 19th century through the eyes of the family that financed much of it.Nathaniel Rothschild is Kanye West. To the European nobles he did business with: He knows you don't like him, he sees you cringing at his Jewishness, but he also knows he runs the show, and he's going to make damn sure you know it. You get giddy reading the contempt he has for the average European aristocrat. It's delightfully similar to the joy we all take, and I'm sure Kanye takes, in making a fool out of Taylor Swift. Why were the French more willing to pay for defeat after the fact than to pay for the chance of victory before war broke out?" (re: Napoleon III's France's willingness to pay more money in reparations than for the initial war in 1870). (p.217) Think my favorite takeaways were on the brilliance of the family's strategy in the latter half of the 19th century. Essentially by playing it more conservative and versus smaller (as they all were) competitors, it meant they both were unlikely to take stupid risks that could jeopardize the business and also would be unable to be seen as making unusually high profits that could invoke the wrath of any government that might have been in such a position. Double-edged sword though was growing number of heirs who found their portions of a pie not as generous as desired and many wishing to pull funds out of the business. A major work of economic, social and political history, Niall Ferguson's The House of Rothschild: The World's Banker 1849-1999 is the second volume of the acclaimed, landmark history of the legendary Rothschild banking dynasty. Niall Ferguson's House of Rothschild: Money's Prophets 1798-1848 was hailed as a 'great biography' by Time magazine and named one of the best books of 1998 by Business Week.

The family in some sense seemed to resemble gods to their fellow Jewish people, the family also heaped scorn on those who converted to Christianity for personal (and apparently shortsighted) gain, while similarly also disowning family members who did not take up the family business and even more so if they converted to Christianity. Also of note in their early years, it sounded like they were willing to give decent shares of the business in their estates to family members who were NOT immediately sons or daughters just to keep the size enough for them to be interested. Nathaniel and his brothers leave the Frankfurt ghetto as the French Revolution is getting underway. Nathaniel goes to London and proceeds to revolutionize financial markets and through daring, cunning, risk-taking, mathematical acumen, and pure viciousness dominate financial markets. The Rothschilds understand markets on a level which is distinctly modern. Concepts that we consider basic, like hedging and arbitrage, they invent to dominate the financial landscape of the Napoleonic Wars and the 19th century. It's a beautiful thing.

Also a senior Rothschild in 1870 after Germany defeated France had the remarkable intuition that if reparations/peace terms were too harsh it would be bad for Europe's economy overall and could threaten stability -- an observation long predating John Maynard Keynes's observation on the Treaty of Versailles. When Ferguson notes that after 1850s, the new banks began to achieve higher profitability than the Rothschilds he decides that their responsible lending habits have become excessively conservative. Apparently, Ferguson is so much in love with the myth in economics of the heroic risk-tasking entrepreneur that even irresponsible risk taking becomes praiseworthy. I don’t intend to provide extension observations about each of these volumes. To do each one justice would require much more time than I can devote to the task. The author himself wrote that the creation of this history was much longer than planned for: I am not surprised given the wealth of material.