The Starchild Skull -- Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?

Product Information

The forensic sketch shows an illustration if missing bones were replaced and only the bones that showed signs of once existing. Problem with the Answer:It didn't have any of these conditions as proven by X-Rays and CT scans, andthe Starchild Skull is not a fossil. (Fossils are over 10,000 years old, the Starchild Skull is only 900 years old, reference the C14 dating report Though the rear of the Starchild Skull is widely expanded and greatly flattened, this is not the result of deliberate binding or cradleboarding. This was verified in 2004 br Dr Ted Robinson and his team. The primary strike against them is the 2003 DNA analysis. The child had normal human DNA and was male, having both X and Y chromosomes, proving that it had a human female mother and a human male father. Young and Pye state that this is consistent with the alien-human hybrid theory, which it may be, who knows; no known alien DNA exists to use as a reference. But it is also consistent with a human child with a well documented and thoroughly understood illness. The Peruvian Coneheads HuffPost, σεέναάρθροτου 2013 γιατον Lloyd Pye καιτοέργοτουπουσχετίζεταιμετο Starchild Skull, «δενχρειάζονταιπολλάακόμαγιαναπάρουμεθέσηγιατηνύπαρξηεξωγήινων».Παρ’όλααυτά, ηεπίσημηεπιστήμησυνεχίζειναυποστηρίζειότιτοκρανίοανήκεισεέναείδοςανθρώπινουπαιδιούμεκάποιοείδοςυδροκεφαλία, παραποιώνταςταεξωγήιναεπιχειρήματα, ωςψευδοεπιστήμη…

Novella, S. "The Starchild Project." The New England Skeptical Society. The New England Skeptical Society, 1 Feb. 2006. Web. 14 Jan. 2010.

Sign up to our free newsletters

We also know that people living in the hollow world were worried after the atomic bombs exploded in Hiroshima and Nagasaki and sent UFOs, which were called "flugelrad", to the surface of the world for exploration and observation. As I mentioned earlier, Nordic aliens appeared in the 1950s, so the dates are pretty much the same. In the spring of 2016, Melanie Young was present at a conference and asked Chase Kloetzke to be the lead investigator on a new project – to determine conclusively if the Starchild Skull was part alien. Soon after, Kerry McClure joined The Field Reports team. The parameters of the project were set: to conduct a scientific investigation using above-normal credentialed professionals to obtain admissible and testable evidence with no agenda other than to discover the truth of what the Starchild Skull was. Roberts, Alice (2015). The Incredible Unlikeliness of Being: Evolution and the Making of Us. Quercus. pp.87–88. ISBN 978-1623658083. Problem with the Answer:No child could grind its teeth down so much in such a short period of time, and the teeth do not exhibit the crowding or uneven enamel that are the hallmarks of Progeria.

If you don’t want to read all of the text below, simply spend about 2 hours listening to these next 2 recordings. A comparison should clearly highlight the main problems which I attempt to analyse in detail below. The teeth of the Skull are a controversial subject, as many experts feel they show the Starchild was a child of about 5 years old, however the biting surfaces of the teeth are worn and ground to a degree that seems impossible for such a young child, especially one with smaller than normal chewing muscles Undisclosed Lab – In 2010 the key finding was the first recovery of nuDNA from the Starchild Skull. Nuclear DNA (from both parents, gives individuals their unique qualities) was recovered from the Starchild Skull for the first time. No documents, evidence of the sample, reports, or records found regarding nuclear DNA findings. This DNA was submitted to the US National Institutes of Health BLAST for comparison to all other DNA in their database. Some of the DNA was similar to that of a human while some could not be matched. “If these results can be reproduced and verified, it will show that the Skull is a previously undiscovered species.” – The Starchild Project. No documents, evidence of the sample, reports, chain of custody or records found regarding a FoxP2 sample to the “Blast” data bank or Genetic Facility was available to The Field Reports. An un-named geneticist conducted this test and the information reported is controversial at best. There is no room in any investigation to repeat proclamations from people who will not allow their name, work place, and credentials to be published. The Field Reports team does know the identity of this alleged scientist but have promised confidentiality to TSP on this matter and only on this matter. We will always honor our word. What we can reveal is that this “geneticist” is NOT a geneticist but a virologist that has worked on Lyme disease and is no longer employed with his University. Near Coshocton, Ohio in 1837, a number of "pygmy" skeletons are said to have been found. Various reports give the number as being "several" on the low end, to "very numerous" and "tenants of a large city" on the high end. Remains of wood found near some of them suggested that they may have originally been buried in coffins. The skeletons were three to four feet tall, and no objects were found that may have helped identify them. Unfortunately the skeletons were "reduced to chalky ashes" and could not be preserved or documented.The first ancient DNA test was undertaken four years later, in 2003. It recovered human mitochondrial DNA but no nuclear DNA. This suggested a human mother and non-human father, leading to conjecture about the Starchild being a human-alien hybrid or, more likely, an unknown species with some genetic similarities to humans. Incidentally, the female human skull discovered with the Starchild Skull was found to be genetically unrelated to the Starchild, ruling out speculation that the female was the Starchild’s mother. Perhaps the most famous of the "strange skulls" is the so-called "Starchild Skull", the skull of a five-year-old child found alongside a normal adult in a cave in Mexico, carbon dated to about 900 years old. Although only the top half of the skull remains, its severe deformities are clear. The skull is exceptionally broad and bulbous, not unlike modern concept sketches of "gray aliens". For this reason, the skull's current owner, Ray Young and author Lloyd Pye promote the skull as alien, or possibly an alien-human hybrid. Removed 2012 DNA post – http://web.archive.org/web/20131231054638/http://starchildproject.com/dna-testing/2010-nuclear-dna-report

Medina County, Ohio, 1881. Nine skeletons found while digging the cellar of a house, all with double teeth. The skulls were so large one man was able to put one on like a hat, and it rested upon his shoulders. Skeptic's Answer:It is a child of about 5 years old, and possibly had Progeria, which causes dental problems.Concluding the investigation and compiling the entirety of the scientific data from the many scientists involved, we can safely say that the Starchild Skull is not alien, nor a hybrid of a human and alien. He was 100% a human male child with profound deformities. When we began the investigation, we had no expectations besides completing testing and examinations by credentialed scientists to the extent that modern science and technology could take us. We were not working from speculation or relying on any research done in the past besides the carbon dating. We were not hoping for the Starchild Skull to be human or alien, even though that discovery (although unprovable at this time without comparable DNA) would have been groundbreaking. We were searching only for the truth. Additional Theories for Abnormalities Artists depiction of how the child would have looked, after analysis of the Starchild Skull. (tonio48 / Deviant Art ) DNA Testing of the Starchild Skull The Starchild Skull weighs half as much as a normal skull. The Starchild Skull weighs the same as all other 5-6-year-old skulls. The previous conclusions were in comparison with adult skulls. Increased head skull size – http://www.rightdiagnosis.com/symptoms/macrocephaly_in_children/causes.htm In 1829, in Chesterton, Ohio, a mound was excavated in which was found a jawbone with "more teeth" than modern humans, and which was so large that it could fit over the face of a man known for his large jaw.