Intel Core i3-9100F Desktop Processor 4 Core Up to 4.2 GHz without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 65W

Product Information

Nomor prosesor Intel bukan merupakan ukuran performa. Nomor prosesor membedakan fitur dalam setiap kelompok prosesor, bukan di berbagai kelompok prosesor. Lihat www.intel.com/content/www/id/id/processors/processor-numbers.html untuk rinciannya. The Core i3-9100F is a 4-core/4-thread Coffee Lake CPU, which means it's nearly identical to an 8th, 7th and 6th-gen quad-core. It's also not overly different to a 4th-gen Haswell quad-core except for the upgrade to DDR4 memory. SKU “yang Diumumkan” masih belum tersedia. Silakan baca Tanggal Peluncuran untuk ketersediaan pasar.

Taking a look at performance in 7-zip we see that the 1600 AF is almost twice as fast as the 9100F for compression work, here it was a whopping 93% faster. In fact, the Ryzen processor was just 11% slower than the Core i7-8700K and in a completely different league to the Core i3 model. System and Maximum TDP is based on worst case scenarios. Actual TDP may be lower if not all I/Os for chipsets are used. Compared to the older Core i3-8100, the i3-9100F offers around 10 to 15 percent higher performance. Therefore, the CPU is well suited for simple office tasks but less for high end gaming or demanding applications. Through my research, I found out that not only does the i5-9400F do well, but this i3-9100F does an amazing job at gaming as well. Of course, it is not without its share of cons. The RX 5600 XTdoesn’t support Ray tracing and DLSS. If you want those features, the RTX 2060 Super mentioned above is the best fit for you.

Thermal Solution Specification

That you are on a budget or not and you're build is just to game casually, right now, imo there is no point to go for any "bigger" than the i3-9100F. This CPU benchmarks better on single-core and quad-core than the i7 7700 and the i7 7700 is more than competent and capable for today's needs. My build runs LoL at 80 fps with everything maxed. If you want to record and stream your games as you play, I recommend you go for the i5 9600KF or look into the AMD Ryzens before going into i7s or i9s. The 1600 AF on the other hand is silky smooth with 1% lows of around 60 fps and an average frame rate of 77 fps, making the Ryzen processors 24% faster than the Core i3. This article evaluates Intel's Core i3-9100F desktop CPU. We evaluated Intel's Core i3-9100F and compared it to others to determine which provides the best value as a gaming CPU. We shaped our testing methodology to focus on each CPU's attributes rather than solely on benchmarks. O TDP máximo e do sistema se baseiam nos piores casos. O TDP real pode ser inferior, se nem todas as E/Ss para chipsets forem utilizadas. For playing games on a budget CPU, first up we have Assassin's Creed: Odyssey. This game punishes quad-cores and as you'd expect, the 9100F fairs no better than the 7600K. Granted we're still looking at playable performance with the quad-cores, but frame stuttering will be much more apparent with these CPUs.

Frekuensi Turbo Maksimum mengacu pada frekuensi maksimum prosesor single-core yang dapat dicapai dengan Intel® Turbo Boost Technology. Lihat http://www.intel.com/content/www/id/id/architecture-and-technology/turbo-boost/turbo-boost-technology.html untuk informasi lebih lanjut. Lihat http://ipt.intel.com/ untuk mengetahui jenis sistem yang mendukung Intel® Identity Protection Technology (Intel® IPT). The 9100F has the advantage of using less power, but when comparing total system usage, it's actually worse in terms of performance per watt. Here the 1600 AF consumed 50% more power, but it was 85% faster, so significantly more efficient and that's largely due to it's SMT support.When it comes to decompression work that figure is blown out to a massive 127% margin, making the Ryzen CPU worlds faster than the 9100F and just 3% slower than the 8700K. In 2023, those features are getting the recognition they deserve thanks to games such as Cyberpunk 2077, Watch Dogs: Legion, etc. Intel processor numbers are not a measure of performance. Processor numbers differentiate features within each processor family, not across different processor families. See http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/processor-numbers.html for details. He was only getting around 40-50 FPS(frames per second) on the old motherboard/CPU, and he was in real need of an upgrade.

The processor has a 3.60 GHz base frequency and supports a 4.20 GHz single-core max turbo frequency. Hitman 2 typically isn't a great title for Ryzen CPUs, the 3rd gen Ryzen 7 3700X falls short of even the Core i7-7700K for example. However, this title also requires more than 4 threads. In the case of the 7700K it skates by thanks to Hyper-Threading support. The 7600K though struggles and it's the exact same story with the 9100F, the game is still playable and relatively smooth, but the 1600 AF does have a clear advantage here. Battlefield V is even more demanding that Assassin's Creed: Odyssey and here frame stuttering is a massive problem with the quad-core chip. There is a 137% performance disparity between the 1% low and average frame rate with the 9100F, while we only see a 38% disparity with the 1600 AF. Far Cry New Dawn isn't a CPU demanding game, at least not in the sense that it utilizes core heavy CPUs very well. However, we include this title deliberately as it's a good example of how some older titles behave with modern processors. It can run most esports games at 100+ FPS without even having to tone down the graphics settings. Most AAA games run without any FPS drops. It replaces the GTX 1070 for a much lower price and offers you a decent value for money.We've experienced that single-core performance is essential for some games, as many don't take full advantage of multiple cores. All those caveats aside... the i3-9100F is a spectacular bargain that can do 95% of what its more expensive cousins do at half the price or less, for anything but an enthusiast workload. 4 threads is more than adequate for the typical user or gamer, as most typical applications and games are only lightly threaded. In both benchmarks and actual workloads, the 9100F performs nearly on-par with the i5-9400F, which is twice as expensive. The only real distinction between the chips in practice is that the 9400F is a 6 core processor; unless you routinely use heavily threaded applications, there's virtually no benefit to the i5 chips (until you reach the 9600KF, which is almost 3x the cost of the 9100F). Fitur ini mungkin tidak tersedia pada semua sistem komputasi. Harap periksa dengan vendor sistem untuk mengetahui apakah sistem Anda menyediakan fitur ini, atau lihat spesifikasi sistem (motherboard, prosesor, chipset, catu daya, HDD, kontroler grafis, memori, BIOS, driver, monitor mesin virtual (VMM), perangkat lunak platform, dan/atau sistem operasi) untuk kompatibilitas fitur. Fungsionalitas, kinerja, dan manfaat lain dari fitur ini mungkin berbeda tergantung pada konfigurasi sistem. It's also important to note that while the 9100F is 14% faster than the 1600 AF, the Ryzen 5 processor still allowed for over 60 fps at all times and didn't suffer from poor frame time performance, the game played very smoothly. The RTX 2060 Superis a power-efficient graphics card. It has a TDP rating of 175W for which a 600W power supply should be decent enough. It has a two-fan cooling system that offers you excellent cooling.

Intel specifies the CPU with a TDP of 65 Watt. For desktops that means that the processor wont need big cooling solutions and can be used in small cases. Its price to performance ratio is excellent. It beats the RTX 2060 in almost all games in terms of raw FPS. Intel classifications are for general, educational and planning purposes only and consist of Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) and Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) numbers. Any use made of Intel classifications are without recourse to Intel and shall not be construed as a representation or warranty regarding the proper ECCN or HTS. Your company as an importer and/or exporter is responsible for determining the correct classification of your transaction. Finally we have the Total War: Three Kingdoms results and again, the 1600 AF edged out the 9100F, this time allowing for 10% more frames on average and a 23% improvement in 1% low performance.

The RX 5600 XTis based on AMD’s Navi architecture. It has 2304 Cores running at 1130MHz. It has a generous 6GB Memory that is decent enough for 1080p gaming. Klasifikasi Intel adalah untuk tujuan umum, pendidikan dan perencanaan dan terdiri dari Export Control Classification Numbers (ECCN) dan Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS). Segala penggunaan atas klasifikasi Intel tidak berhubungan dengan Intel dan tidak boleh dianggap sebagai perwakilan atau jaminan yang terkait dengan ECCN atau HTS yang sesuai. Perusahaan Anda sebagai importir dan/atau eksportir bertanggung jawab untuk menentukan klasifikasi transaksi yang tepat. Semua informasi yang disediakan bisa berubah sewaktu-waktu, tanpa pemberitahuan sebelumnya. Intel mungkin melakukan perubahan terhadap siklus hidup manufaktur, spesifikasi dan deskripsi produk kapan saja, tanpa pemberitahuan terlebih dahulu. Informasi di sini disediakan "apa adanya" dan Intel tidak membuat pernyataan atau jaminan apa pun terkait keakuratan informasi, atau fitur produk, ketersediaan, fungsionalitas, atau kompatibilitas produk yang tercantum. Hubungi vendor sistem untuk informasi lebih lanjut terkait produk atau sistem tertentu. PROS : Quality/Price is awesome. Depending on your build, I expect this CPU to be competent 5 to 7 years. The RTX 2060 Superis based on Turing architecture. It has 2176 CUDA cores running at 1470MHz. It has a huge 8GB GDDR6 VRAM that makes 1080p gaming a breeze.